NA DRINKS ARE BOOMING. SO WHY ARE BOTTLE SHOPS CLOSING?

NA DRINKS ARE BOOMING. SO WHY ARE BOTTLE SHOPS CLOSING?

The Sober Economy Is Growing Up. And the Business Model Is Changing.

Non-alcoholic drinks are booming. Bottle shops are closing. Functional beverages, THC and Big Alcohol are moving into the same conversation. Maybe the real story isn't that the sober economy is shrinking. Maybe it's that everything is starting to merge.

Something strange is happening in the sober economy.

The drinks are everywhere.

Non-alcoholic beer that once required a scavenger hunt now has supermarket shelf space. Restaurants have zero-proof menus. Functional beverages promise everything from relaxation to focus. Kava, kanna, mushrooms and adaptogens are becoming part of the conversation. THC beverages are competing for the adult consumer. And some of the largest alcohol companies in the world are investing in what people drink when they aren't drinking alcohol.

At the exact same time, some of the independent non-alcoholic bottle shops that helped introduce people to this world are closing.

Those two things can look contradictory.

They're not.

The category can be winning while some of the businesses that helped build the category are losing.

And after watching this market evolve for years, it feels less like the end of something than the beginning of its next phase.

Before there was much of an industry

Go back to 2017 and the landscape looked very different.

Recovery had plenty of infrastructure around stopping.

Rehab.

Inpatient.

Outpatient.

Meetings.

Treatment.

And occasionally something that felt a little like sober summer camp.

All important.

But there was another question rattling around:

What about living?

Where was the play?

Where were the adult spaces you went because you wanted to be there—not because a treatment plan told you to?

Where did adults meet new people, date, laugh, hear music, play games, learn something, have an interesting drink and just hang out without alcohol or gambling being the center of the experience?

That question became the beginning of what I now call Recovery Playground.

When I was putting together my first PowerPoint around that vision in 2017, I searched for examples of sober social spaces around the country.

The one sober bar I could find in that research was Sans Bar in Austin.

Turns out Chris Marshall was beginning his own experiment at almost exactly the same time. Sans Bar says it began in 2017 as monthly Austin pop-ups before becoming a brick-and-mortar concept; today it describes itself as North America's first non-alcoholic bar.

That gives some perspective on how much has happened in less than a decade.

Today, we're not searching for evidence that adults might want alternatives.

We're trying to understand what happens now that they have so many of them.

Somewhere along the way, an industry appeared

The last several years created an explosion of products and businesses.

Non-alcoholic bottle shops.

Sober bars.

Mocktail pop-ups.

NA beer.

Wine.

Spirits.

Functional beverages.

Nootropics.

Adaptogens.

Kava.

Kanna.

Mushrooms.

Botanicals.

And now a rapidly evolving THC beverage market.

The research is beginning to reflect that blur.

IWSR now tracks not only traditional no-alcohol products but a category it calls "alcohol adjacents"—including non-intoxicating hemp beverages, nootropics, adaptogenic functional drinks, botanicals, sparkling teas and fermented beverages.

Its 2026 research found that people often choose traditional no-alcohol products and these newer functional alternatives for different reasons. Health and moderation are stronger drivers for traditional NA products, while curiosity and the experience offered by functional ingredients play a larger role in alcohol adjacents.

That's fascinating because it points to something happening beyond the traditional definition of "sober drinks."

Drinking culture itself is changing.

And some of those changes are much easier to see when you're standing behind a counter watching what people ask for, taste, reject, reorder and tell their friends about.

The view from inside is different

3-21 No Kiddin’ opened in 2023, but the learning didn't begin—or stay—inside that first roughly 800-square-foot store.

There have been podcast conversations with people in recovery.

Sober-business cohorts.

Founder conversations.

Peers trying to make livelihoods in the industry.

Customers explaining what they wish existed.

Brands trying to get noticed.

And more than 50 visits to non-alcoholic bottle shops, sober bars and alcohol-free concepts across the country.

 

Not as some formal academic study.

More like a very long-running obsession with a question:

What is actually working here?

Walk through enough of these businesses and certain patterns become difficult to unsee.

And lately, one of the most important patterns is showing up in the businesses that aren't making it.

The bottle shops are telling us something

In April, Axios reported that three of the Twin Cities' four dedicated non-alcoholic bottle shops had announced closures in 2026, leaving the remaining shop operating week to week.

The reason given by Marigold owner Erin Flavin could almost be a case study for the entire industry: larger stores can sell products more cheaply, and once customers discover what they like, they can buy it closer to home.

Then came Verbena Free Spirited in Cleveland.

This one hits differently because I've been there.

Molly Cheraso built more than a wall of bottles. Verbena had drinks, hospitality, gathering and community.

She also taught me how to make what remains my favorite Kava Haven recipe to this day:

a Kava Painkiller.

Those little exchanges mattered in the early days of this industry.

Operators shared recipes.

We introduced one another to products.

Founders taught retailers.

Retailers taught customers.

Everybody compared notes.

We were building the playbook while we were playing the game.

On September 15, Cleveland Scene reported that Verbena will close September 26 after three years. Molly isn't leaving the industry; she told the publication she plans to continue hosting NA events and consulting with restaurants on their non-alcoholic programs.

That's worth noticing.

The storefront may close while the expertise becomes more valuable.

Boisson tells another version of the same story

Boisson was very different from the small independent bottle-shop model—and another business I made a point of visiting.

It expanded to 11 stores across New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Miami, backed by an ambitious specialty-retail, e-commerce and wholesale strategy.

Then the physical stores closed and the company entered bankruptcy.

Founder Nick Bodkins later described those stores as resource-intensive and said something particularly important: mainstream retailers learned how to incorporate non-alcoholic products faster than Boisson anticipated.

That's not evidence that people stopped wanting NA products.

It's almost the opposite.

The market Boisson helped prove became more competitive because everybody else realized the market existed.

That's the paradox.

The pioneers taught people how to shop

Specialty bottle shops did a tremendous amount of consumer education.

We tasted the weird stuff.

Bought products nobody recognized.

Met founders.

Researched ingredients.

Explained adaptogens.

Talked about kava.

Learned about kanna.

Figured out mushrooms.

Opened bottles.

Poured samples.

Explained why one bottle cost $38 and another cost $12.

And here's the part consumers don't necessarily see:

The specialty retailer assumes the risk.

That case on the shelf?

Already paid for.

The bottle opened for tasting?

Paid for.

The product that sounded fantastic but nobody bought?

Still paid for.

The research?

Time.

The conversation with the founder?

Time.

The twenty-minute conversation helping someone figure out what they'll actually enjoy?

Time.

And beverage retail isn't exactly known for enormous margins.

Then the retailer does the job really well.

A customer discovers something they love.

Six months later, it's at the supermarket.

Or the liquor store.

Or online.

Or available directly from the manufacturer.

Maybe cheaper.

Maybe closer.

Maybe delivered tomorrow.

The independent retailer helped create the customer—and now everybody gets to compete for the reorder.

That's not a complaint.

That's a business-model problem.

And eventually, this becomes a money game

A great drink isn't enough.

That's one of the tougher lessons in this industry.

There are probably extraordinary beverages being created right now that most consumers will never taste.

Not necessarily because another product is better.

Another company may simply have:

More money.

More marketing.

More salespeople.

More affiliates.

More production capacity.

More promotional dollars.

More distributor relationships.

More retailer relationships.

More consumer recognition.

And an easier route onto the shelf.

Big Alcohol isn't sitting out the moderation movement.

Diageo describes moderation as one of its major long-term opportunities. Its non-alcoholic portfolio grew approximately 40% in fiscal 2025, and the company acquired Ritual Beverage Company while continuing to grow brands including Guinness 0.0, Tanqueray 0.0, Gordon's 0.0 and Seedlip.

That doesn't make Big Alcohol the bad guy.

It makes Big Alcohol extremely well equipped.

The tiny founder with a great botanical drink isn't entering the race with the same resources.

And if you don't understand that before getting into this business, at some point it becomes a money game you're playing without understanding the rules.

Shelf space doesn't care how much you believe in your mission

The recent Kroger/Red Bull situation is a fascinating illustration.

Reporting based on Kroger's own in-store signage documented empty Red Bull shelf space while Kroger and the supplier were working through a pricing disagreement. The actual commercial terms aren't public, so there's no reason to pretend we know what happened behind closed doors.

But think about the two names involved.

Kroger.

Red Bull.

If Red Bull can find itself visibly absent from Kroger shelves while two enormous companies work through the economics, imagine the position of a founder with an unknown beverage, a small production run and a marketing department consisting mostly of a cell phone.

Shelf space isn't awarded because your founder story is beautiful.

It's economics.

Velocity.

Margin.

Production.

Distribution.

Promotional support.

Relationships.

Data.

Packaging.

Consumer demand.

And, yes:

money.

The truck that's already coming matters

Distribution may be one of the least exciting—and most important—parts of this entire conversation.

A restaurant already knows how to order beer.

The distributor knows how to deliver it.

The salesperson has the relationship.

The account exists.

The invoice system exists.

The truck is already coming.

Now imagine you're selling an emerging functional beverage made with an ingredient the beverage manager has never heard of.

First somebody has to explain what the hell it is.

Then maybe there's another vendor.

Another minimum.

Another invoice.

Another delivery.

Another salesperson.

Another thing for a busy hospitality operator to manage.

Meanwhile, an established beverage company can potentially place a new zero-proof extension into relationships and infrastructure that already exist.

Easy to buy matters.

It's not sexy.

It's business.

Then the cooler got even more complicated

Here's where the story gets particularly interesting.

NA beer isn't simply competing against NA beer anymore.

The adult looking for something other than alcohol may be considering a functional beverage.

Kava.

Mushrooms.

Adaptogens.

A botanical.

An energy drink.

A THC beverage.

Something that promises relaxation.

Something that promises focus.

Something that promises a social feeling without alcohol.

And something I've learned from having an actual brick-and-mortar store is that emerging drinking culture doesn't always reveal itself first in an industry report.

Sometimes it walks through the front door.

People ask questions.

They ask for products you've never heard of.

They tell you what their friends are drinking.

They describe the feeling they're trying to get.

They want to know what's next.

Some trends become visible at the counter long before they become obvious on a spreadsheet.

That's one of the unexpected benefits of physical retail:

The store becomes a listening post.

Connecticut taught me something about THC without letting me sell it

THC beverages are a perfect example.

3-21 No Kiddin’ couldn't simply add THC drinks to the cooler when the category started gaining attention.

Connecticut changed its rules in 2024 so that THC-infused beverages could be sold only through licensed cannabis retail establishments and qualifying package stores. Package stores now need the required endorsement and must purchase those beverages through permitted wholesale channels. A moderate-THC hemp vendor certificate does not authorize the sale of THC-infused beverages.

3-21 No Kiddin’ isn't a package store or cannabis retailer.

So that emerging category wasn't an available revenue stream for us.

But that didn't mean it wasn't teaching me something.

Customers were talking about it.

The beverage industry was talking about it.

Distributors were moving toward it.

Traditional beverage companies were paying attention to cannabis too; even Diageo's 2025 annual report specifically identified cannabis alongside moderation and changing Gen Z consumption patterns as a trend its leadership was monitoring.

That's an important distinction between selling a trend and learning from a trend.

You don't have to carry every emerging product to understand what its popularity is telling you about changing adult drinking behavior.

And I don't think I would understand some of those signals the same way if I hadn't spent years inside a physical store talking directly to consumers.

Kratom teaches a different lesson

Kratom—and particularly the controversy surrounding concentrated 7-OH products—illustrates another part of operating anywhere near emerging functional categories.

The rules can change while the market is developing.

In July 2026, the DEA began a temporary-scheduling process involving 7-hydroxymitragynine above a proposed threshold and several synthetic 7-OH derivatives. FDA has emphasized distinctions between concentrated or synthetic 7-OH products and the natural kratom plant itself.

Whether another operator decides to carry a particular product isn't the point here.

The point is that a retailer can't see something exploding on TikTok, put it in a cooler and assume everything underneath that product is settled.

What exactly is in it?

How is it produced?

What claims are being made?

What's legal where you operate?

What does your insurer think?

What does your payment processor think?

Who is the customer?

Does it fit the mission?

And in a sober business there is another question:

What exactly does "sober" mean here?

Alcohol-free?

Substance-free?

Recovery-centered?

Harm reduction?

Functional alternatives?

Adult alternatives to alcohol?

Those aren't automatically the same thing.

Your guardrails are part of your business model.

Passion still has to pay the rent

There's another pattern that's harder to put on a sales chart.

Spend enough time in sober cohorts, recovery communities, founder conversations and podcast interviews and you meet incredible people trying to build something meaningful out of something that changed their lives.

Someone gets sober.

They discover community.

They find products they love.

They experience connection differently.

And eventually comes the thought:

Other people need this too.

That's powerful.

It's also where mission and business can collide.

People can be extraordinary at creating impact and still struggle to create sustainable income.

Not because they aren't passionate enough.

Not because they aren't smart enough.

Sometimes the economics are just hard.

Sometimes the rent is wrong.

Sometimes inventory consumes the cash.

Sometimes the location doesn't work.

Sometimes the market changes.

Sometimes the community absolutely loves what you've built—but doesn't spend enough money there to support what it costs to provide it.

Sometimes the founder came from an entirely different career and discovers that retail, hospitality and entrepreneurship require a completely different set of muscles.

Impact and income are two different measurements.

For the sober economy to mature, it eventually has to figure out both.

 

Pioneers pay for the playbook

That's what makes these closures worth studying instead of simply mourning.

Some of the first generation will stay.

Some will pivot.

Some will close.

Some will go online.

Some will become event companies.

Some will consult.

Some brands will get acquired.

Some will disappear.

Some ideas will turn out to have been too early.

Others will become so mainstream that we'll forget they once seemed strange.

That's what emerging industries do.

Pioneers don't get handed a proven business model.

They pay to discover one.

Sometimes with inventory.

Sometimes with rent.

Sometimes with time.

Sometimes with a move.

Sometimes with a bad idea.

Sometimes with an idea that was right but arrived too early.

And sometimes with the business itself.

The question isn't simply:

Why are bottle shops closing?

The more useful question is:

What are they teaching us about what comes next?

Which makes one decision in Naugatuck look a little strange

While all of this has been unfolding, the original Recovery Playground vision from 2017 never went away.

The first 3-21 No Kiddin’ gave that vision roughly 800 square feet in 2023.

Then came three years of customers.

Products.

Mistakes.

Events.

Cohorts.

Podcast conversations.

Founder relationships.

Road trips.

More than 50 sober and alcohol-free concepts.

A changing beverage industry.

And a lot of watching.

Then, in 2026—while some dedicated bottle shops around the country were announcing closures—3-21 No Kiddin’ moved into roughly 2,500 square feet.

We got bigger.

Not because the warning signs weren't visible.

Because they were.

That decision brought the business another step closer to the Recovery Playground vision that existed before today's NA marketplace did.

There are reasons studying this industry made a larger space make sense to me.

I'm not going to unpack all of them here.

Some are still being tested.

Some are still evolving.

And some deserve a much bigger conversation than a paragraph in a blog.

But here's what three years inside the market—and nearly a decade thinking about the larger problem—has done:

It hasn't made the opportunity look smaller.

It's made the opportunity look different.

Maybe we've been asking too small a question

Maybe the future isn't:

How big can the non-alcoholic beverage industry become?

We already know people want options.

Maybe the more interesting questions are:

What do adults want instead?

Instead of the drink.

Instead of the bar.

Instead of the casino.

Instead of sitting home.

Instead of another social experience built around something they don't want to do anymore.

Where do adults gather?

How do they meet?

How do they play?

How do they celebrate?

What do they drink?

How do they want to feel?

What role do functional beverages play?

What happens as NA, wellness, hospitality, cannabis and traditional beverage companies increasingly compete for the same occasions?

What happens to the pioneers?

What new businesses emerge?

And which models actually make enough money to survive?

That's why I don't think the sober economy is disappearing.

I think it's merging.

And once categories begin merging, the people who understand the spaces between them become very interesting.

We're still figuring out what comes next.

Some of us have just been watching the experiment longer.


Thinking about building in this space?

Thinking about opening a sober bar, bottle shop, mocktail business, mobile concept or alcohol-free social space?

Let’s connect.

I’m gathering the dreamers, planners and operators who are thinking seriously about what comes next in this industry. If that’s you, I’d love to know what you’re building—or what you can’t stop thinking about building.

I’M THINKING ABOUT IT → Click here and Let's Connect

And if you're looking at this changing market from the retail, supermarket, hospitality, beverage, recovery or organizational side and there's a conversation worth having, reach out.

Build for where the market is going—not simply where it's been.

Bobbie Malatesta
Creator, 3-21 No Kiddin’
Creator, Recovery Playground

Back to blog